Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 12.32 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a score of 91.2, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's 85.6 overall score. Even though the LG Wing is better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, we must tell that it's also older, notably thicker and a lot heavier. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the LG Wing has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little faster processor than LG Wing. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and 8 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little more vivid screen than LG Wing, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch and a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution.
LG Wing features a superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. The LG Wing features greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 21% larger battery capacity.
LG Wing takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same aperture, the LG Wing also has a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera.
The LG Wing costs exactly the same than the Galaxy Z Flip 3.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.