Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is a bit better than LG Wing's 91.2 score. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and LG Wing has Android 10 version. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is extremely thinner but just a little bit heavier than the LG Wing, and both of them were only released 1 months apart.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 and LG Wing feature really similar displays, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a just a bit lower display pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a little better performance than LG Wing, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The LG Wing shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG Wing also has a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality photos and a lot better 64 MP resolution camera in the back.
LG Wing features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal storage, the LG Wing also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better battery duration than LG Wing, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG Wing, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Wing. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the LG Wing, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.