Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 12.32 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a global score of 91.2, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's 90.6 score. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG Wing has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has Android 11. The LG Wing design is just a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, but it is much thicker and was released around 10 months before.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little better performance than LG Wing, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The LG Wing has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2460 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater number of pixels per screen inch.
The LG Wing takes way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and video and a way better resolution back facing camera. The LG Wing features a much better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Wing also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than LG Wing, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.