Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-15 | -- |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 12.32 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a general score of 91.2, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's 91.1 global score. Both phones in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but LG Wing has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has Android 14 version. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, LG Wing's body is much thicker and a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a better looking display than LG Wing, because although it has a bit inferior pixels amount in each inch of screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a better 1968 x 2184 pixels resolution. LG Wing has a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG Wing features a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a bit better battery duration than LG Wing, because it has a 10 percent more battery capacity.
The LG Wing features a better camera than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lot worse 64 mega pixels resolution back camera, they both have the same aperture.
The LG Wing not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.