Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is better than the LG X Mach's global score of 73.5. Apple iPhone XS is a heavier but somewhat thinner cellphone than the LG X Mach. The LG X Mach counts with just a bit better looking display than iPhone XS, because although it has a little smaller screen and way darker screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater display density and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The LG X Mach features a much bigger memory for games and applications than iPhone XS, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Apple iPhone XS counts with a better CPU than LG X Mach, and although they both have a Hexa-Core CPU, the Apple iPhone XS also has a 64 bits CPU and more RAM.
LG X Mach features a little better battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. The Apple iPhone XS features a greater camera than LG X Mach, although it has a lower video resolution and a back camera with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.