Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Asus |
| -- | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-25 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has an overall score of 77.8, which is a bit better than LG X Mach's score of 73.5. Despite being the best device we are comparing, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) construction is a bit thicker and a lot heavier than LG X Mach. The LG X Mach counts with a bit more vivid screen than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per inch of screen.
The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with a little better processing power than LG X Mach, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more processing cores. Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) features a better memory to store more apps and games than LG X Mach, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also has more internal memory.
The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has a way better camera than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also has better 60 fps video frame rates and a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera. The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with a very superior battery life than LG X Mach, because it has a 67 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.