Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is slightly better than the LG X Mach, having a global score of 80.2 against 73.5. Google Pixel's construction is a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than LG X Mach. Google Pixel features just a little better hardware performance than LG X Mach, because although it has less CPU cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM.
LG X Mach features a little more vivid display than Google Pixel, because it has a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution, a little higher pixel density and a quite larger screen. LG X Mach has a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG X Mach features a little longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has an 8% greater battery size. The Google Pixel has a much better camera than LG X Mach. Both of them have a 12.3 mega-pixels resolution back camera, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.