Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than LG X Mach, having an 80 score against 73.5. Google Pixel 3 is a just a little lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than the LG X Mach. Google Pixel 3 features a bit better CPU than LG X Mach, because it has 1 GB more RAM memory and 2 more CPU cores. LG X Mach features a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG X Mach also has a just a bit higher display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The LG X Mach has a superior memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3 takes much clearer videos and photos than LG X Mach, although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back facing camera with a lower 12.2 MP resolution.
LG X Mach counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.