Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is a bit better than the LG X Mach's global score of 73.5. Google Pixel 3a's body is a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than LG X Mach. LG X Mach has just a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better screen density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
LG X Mach has a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3a has just a little better processing power than LG X Mach, because it has more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3a's battery life is just as good as the battery lifetime in LG X Mach. The Google Pixel 3a captures much clearer photos and videos than LG X Mach, although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lesser megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.