Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is better than LG X Mach, getting an 81.9 score against 73.5. The Google Pixel 4 construction is just a little thinner but just a little bit heavier than the LG X Mach. Google Pixel 4 counts with a little faster processor than LG X Mach, because it has a greater number of faster cores and 3 GB more RAM.
The LG X Mach features a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better screen density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The LG X Mach has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG X Mach features a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 7% larger battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4 features a much better camera than LG X Mach, although it has a less MP back-facing camera and a lower (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.