Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has an overall score of 82.9, which is better than the LG X Mach's score of 73.5. Google Pixel 4a is a a little bit thinner and a bit lighter cellphone than LG X Mach. Google Pixel 4a features a bit better hardware performance than LG X Mach, because it has more RAM and 2 more CPU cores.
The LG X Mach counts with a bit better display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a just a bit higher amount of pixels in each display inch. The LG X Mach has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 4a counts with just a little bit longer battery life than LG X Mach, because it has 3140mAh of battery capacity. Google Pixel 4a takes much better videos and photos than LG X Mach, although it has a lesser megapixels back-facing camera and a worse video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.