Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than the LG X Mach, getting an 89 score against 73.5. Google Pixel 5 is a thinner phone than the LG X Mach, but both weight the same. LG X Mach counts with a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel count in each inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit superior processor than LG X Mach, because it has a higher number of cores and 5 GB more RAM memory. The LG X Mach has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 5 shoots a lot better photos and videos than LG X Mach, although it has a lower 12.2 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution. The Google Pixel 5 has a really longer battery performance than LG X Mach, because it has a 4080mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.