Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-03-22 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| -- | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 534 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a score of 92.1, which is a lot better than the LG X Mach's 73.5 global score. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design body has the same thickness than LG X Mach, but it's way heavier. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a more powerful processor than LG X Mach, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much better looking screen than LG X Mach, because although it has a quite lower pixel density and a little worse 1280 x 2800 pixels resolution, it also counts with much more display brightness and a larger screen. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a very superior memory for apps and games than LG X Mach, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much longer battery duration than LG X Mach, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a way better camera than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same video definition, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.