Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 534 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has a score of 77.7, which is slightly better than the LG X Mach's general score of 73.5. Although it's the best cellphone we compare here, the HTC One M9 body is a bit heavier and a bit thicker than LG X Mach. HTC One M9 has a more powerful CPU than LG X Mach, and although they both have 3 GB of RAM, the HTC One M9 also has a graphics processor, a higher number of faster cores and a 64-bit processing unit.
The HTC One M9 counts with a little more vivid display than LG X Mach, although it has a little smaller screen, a little bit inferior count of pixels per inch of display and a much lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. LG X Mach counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than HTC One M9, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG X Mach also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The HTC One M9 captures greater videos and photos than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the HTC One M9 also has a back facing camera with much more MP. The LG X Mach features a bit superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 6% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.