Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-04-11 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ has a general score of 84.3, which is much better than the LG X Mach's general score of 73.5. LG G8 ThinQ's construction is a little heavier but just a little thinner than LG X Mach. LG G8 ThinQ features a little bit better display than LG X Mach, because it has a brighter screen, a little bit greater pixels count in each inch of display, a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a little bit bigger display.
LG G8 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than LG X Mach, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and faster). LG G8 ThinQ has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than LG X Mach, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG G8 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a bit longer battery performance than LG X Mach, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The LG G8 ThinQ takes much better pictures and videos than LG X Mach, although it has a lower resolution camera in the back and a lower video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.