Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-07-02 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8S ThinQ is better than LG X Mach, having a score of 82.5 against 73.5. The LG G8S ThinQ is a somewhat thinner but somewhat heavier cellphone than the LG X Mach. The LG G8S ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than LG X Mach, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and faster).
LG X Mach has a bit sharper screen than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better pixels count per inch in the screen. LG G8S ThinQ counts with a better camera than LG X Mach, although it has a lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
LG G8S ThinQ counts with a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG X Mach, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG G8S ThinQ also has 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The LG G8S ThinQ features superior battery duration than LG X Mach, because it has an 18 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.