Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a general score of 82.7, which is much better than LG X Mach's 73.5 global score. LG G8X ThinQ is a noticeably heavier but a little thinner phone than the LG X Mach. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little better processing power than LG X Mach, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores (and faster).
LG X Mach counts with a little sharper display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The LG G8X ThinQ features a superior memory capacity for applications and games than LG X Mach, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG G8X ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG G8X ThinQ captures much better pictures and videos than LG X Mach, although it has a camera in the back with less mega-pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video quality. LG G8X ThinQ has longer battery duration than LG X Mach, because it has a 33% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.