Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is better than LG X Mach, with a general score of 81.3 against 73.5. The LG V35 ThinQ is a just a bit heavier but thinner cellphone than the LG X Mach. LG X Mach counts with a bit more vivid display than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1440 x 2560 resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than LG X Mach, and although they both have an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 32 GB more internal storage capacity. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than LG X Mach, because it has a larger number of cores and 3 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a back camera with a way higher resolution. LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit longer battery performance than LG X Mach, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.