Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is much better than LG X Mach's overall score of 73.5. The LG V40 ThinQ is a heavier but somewhat thinner phone than the LG X Mach. LG X Mach has a slightly better screen than LG V40 ThinQ, although it has a bit smaller display, a bit lower 1440 x 2560 resolution and a quite worse pixel density.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a quite bigger memory for games and applications than LG X Mach, and although they both have a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more internal memory. LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better performance than LG X Mach, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and faster).
LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better battery duration than LG X Mach, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. The LG V40 ThinQ takes much better videos and photos than LG X Mach, although it has a camera in the back with less mega pixels resolution and a worse video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.