Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a score of 91.2, which is a lot better than the LG X Mach's 73.5 global score. Despite being the best cellphone we compare here, the LG Wing is a noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than LG X Mach. LG X Mach counts with a much better display than LG Wing, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher amount of pixels per screen inch.
The LG Wing counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than LG X Mach, and although they both have an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has 256 GB internal memory. The LG Wing features just a bit better processing power than LG X Mach, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
LG Wing captures way better photos and videos than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG Wing also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera. The LG Wing counts with better battery lifetime than LG X Mach, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.