Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Microsoft |
| -- | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-09-20 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier and Obsidian |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is better than LG X Mach, getting a overall score of 85.3 against 73.5. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a noticeably thinner but heavier cellphone than the LG X Mach. LG X Mach counts with a bit better looking display than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has much lower brightness, a little lower resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a much smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixels density.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a bit superior CPU than LG X Mach, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM memory. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a superior camera than LG X Mach, although it has a back camera with a lower resolution and a lower video definition. The LG X Mach counts with much more memory to install applications and games than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a much better battery life than LG X Mach, because it has a 48% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.