Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is way better than the LG X Mach, with an 89.6 score against 73.5. Motorola edge is a heavier and a little bit thicker device than the LG X Mach. LG X Mach features a brighter screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better pixels density.
The Motorola edge features a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG X Mach, because although it has an external memory slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola edge has a bit better processor than LG X Mach, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and faster).
Motorola edge captures a lot better pictures and videos than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola edge also has a way more MP camera. Motorola edge features a much better battery performance than LG X Mach, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.