Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than the LG X Mach's 73.5 general score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a noticeably heavier but a bit thinner phone than LG X Mach. The LG X Mach counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit sharper display than LG X Mach, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and much lesser pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger screen and way more brightness. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more storage to install games and applications than LG X Mach, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a really longer battery lifetime than LG X Mach, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.