Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 is slightly better than LG X Mach, having a general score of 77.6 against 73.5. Moto Z3's body is thinner but a bit heavier than the LG X Mach. The LG X Mach has a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixel density.
The Motorola Moto Z3 features a little better processing power than LG X Mach, because it has 1 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores. Motorola Moto Z3 shoots much better photos and videos than LG X Mach, although it has a lower video definition and a less mega-pixels back facing camera. The Motorola Moto Z3 has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than LG X Mach, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has 64 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Moto Z3 and LG X Mach both feature similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.