Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is slightly better than the LG X Mach, getting a general score of 78.5 against 73.5. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, the Motorola One Action construction is just a little thicker and heavier than LG X Mach. The LG X Mach features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel quantity in each inch in the screen and a little higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Motorola One Action has a much bigger memory for applications and games than LG X Mach, because although it has an external SD slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Motorola One Action has a bit faster processor than LG X Mach, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and also faster).
The Motorola One Action has a bit longer battery lifetime than LG X Mach, because it has a 3500mAh battery size. The Motorola One Action takes much clearer photographs and videos than LG X Mach, although it has a back facing camera with a worse resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.