Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is better than LG X Mach's overall score of 73.5. The Motorola razr (2020) body is a lot heavier but somewhat thinner than the LG X Mach. LG X Mach features a better display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit better processing unit than LG X Mach, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a very superior camera than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a slightly better memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG X Mach, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. LG X Mach has just a bit better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.