Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 3S has an overall score of 75.8, which is a bit better than the LG X Mach's general score of 73.5. Nubia Red Magic 3S's design is just a little bit thicker and way heavier than the LG X Mach. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a quite superior hardware performance than LG X Mach, because it has 2 more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM.
LG X Mach features a more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The nubia Red Magic 3S shoots a lot better videos and photos than LG X Mach, because it has a lot better resolution back facing camera and a much higher video quality.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit more storage for games and applications than LG X Mach, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much longer battery life than LG X Mach, because it has a 67 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.