Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Sonic silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S is a bit better than the LG X Mach, getting a score of 76.2 against 73.5. Nubia Red Magic 5S is a just a bit thicker and a lot heavier cellphone than the LG X Mach. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG X Mach, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The LG X Mach features a slightly better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little smaller display and a lot more opaque display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixels count in each inch in the screen. LG X Mach counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots much better photographs and videos than LG X Mach, because it has a way higher video resolution and a camera in the back with way more MP. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a way better battery life than LG X Mach, because it has a 50% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.