Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| -- | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G has an overall score of 79.9, which is a bit better than the LG X Mach's 73.5 global score. The Galaxy A25 5G is a just a little thinner but extremely heavier phone than LG X Mach. LG X Mach counts with a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 3 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores.
The LG X Mach counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a lot more opaque screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixel density. Galaxy A25 5G takes much better pictures and videos than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a way bigger storage for games and applications than LG X Mach, because although it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a superior battery performance than LG X Mach, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.