Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has an overall score of 81.3, which is better than LG X Mach's score of 73.5. The Samsung Galaxy A31 body is somewhat heavier but a little bit thinner than the LG X Mach. Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a bit better performance than LG X Mach, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
LG X Mach has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. LG X Mach counts with slightly more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A31, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A31 features a really longer battery performance than LG X Mach, because it has a 67 percent more battery size. The Galaxy A31 takes greater photographs and videos than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A31 also has a back camera with a way better 48 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.