Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| -- | 2022-04-22 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 8.36 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A33 5G is slightly better than the LG X Mach, with a overall score of 77.8 against 73.5. The Galaxy A33 5G body is just a little bit thinner but somewhat heavier than the LG X Mach. The LG X Mach features an extremely better processor than Galaxy A33 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser CPU cores (although faster).
LG X Mach counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G has a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG X Mach, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A33 5G counts with a much longer battery life than LG X Mach, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity. The Galaxy A33 5G has a superior camera than LG X Mach, because it has a lot better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.