Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-04-10 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A40 has a global score of 79.6, which is slightly better than LG X Mach's overall score of 73.5. Galaxy A40 is a thinner and just a little lighter device than the LG X Mach. Galaxy A40 counts with a bit faster processing unit than LG X Mach, because it has more 1.8 gigahertz cores and more RAM.
The LG X Mach has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a bit greater number of pixels in each inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A40 has a much better camera than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A40 also has a back camera with a way better resolution.
LG X Mach has a little bit better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A40, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A40 features just a little bit longer battery duration than LG X Mach, because it has a 3% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.