Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A41 is much better than LG X Mach, getting an 81.7 score against 73.5. Galaxy A41's body is a little heavier but somewhat thinner than LG X Mach. LG X Mach has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A41, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a quite better pixels quantity per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A41 features a bit faster CPU than LG X Mach, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A41 has a much better camera than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also has a back facing camera with way more MP.
The LG X Mach has a little bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A41, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A41 features a bit superior battery duration than LG X Mach, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.