Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is much better than the LG X Mach, with a 90.7 score against 73.5. The Samsung Galaxy A52 construction is way heavier but just a little bit thinner than LG X Mach. The Galaxy A52 has a little better performance than LG X Mach, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM.
The LG X Mach counts with a better screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher screen density. Galaxy A52 counts with a way better camera than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also has a back-facing camera with a much better 64 MP resolution.
The Galaxy A52 features much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG X Mach, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a way better battery lifetime than LG X Mach, because it has a 50 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.