Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is just a bit better than the LG X Mach, with a overall score of 76.9 against 73.5. The Galaxy A70 is a somewhat heavier but somewhat thinner cellphone than LG X Mach. The LG X Mach has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixels density.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than LG X Mach, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A70 features a bit better processing power than LG X Mach, because it has 3 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The LG X Mach takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy A70. Both of them have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a much longer battery performance than LG X Mach, because it has a 50% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.