Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot better than LG X Mach, with a 92.9 score against 73.5. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a a little thinner but heavier phone than the LG X Mach. LG X Mach has a better display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better screen density.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than LG X Mach, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little faster processor than LG X Mach, because it has 5 GB more RAM and more cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots way better photos and videos than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a camera in the back with a much better resolution. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a superior battery duration than LG X Mach, because it has a 50% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.