Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is a lot better than LG X Mach's 73.5 general score. The Galaxy Fold body is a lot heavier but noticeably thinner than the LG X Mach. LG X Mach features a more vivid display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a slightly better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Fold has a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG X Mach, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a better processing power than LG X Mach, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM.
Galaxy Fold counts with a way better battery performance than LG X Mach, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity. Galaxy Fold shoots much better photos and videos than LG X Mach, although it has a camera with a lower 12 megapixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.