Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 has a general score of 78.9, which is a bit better than LG X Mach's 73.5 score. The Galaxy M20 is a somewhat heavier cellphone than the LG X Mach, but both of them are 0.35inches thick. The LG X Mach has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixels density.
Galaxy M20 counts with a little better hardware performance than LG X Mach, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more processing cores. The LG X Mach features a bit more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy M20, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy M20 counts with a superior battery lifetime than LG X Mach, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a little bit better camera than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M20 also has a back camera with a better 13 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.