Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than the LG X Mach, getting a 79.3 score against 73.5. Samsung Galaxy Note 5's body is heavier but somewhat thinner than the LG X Mach. The LG X Mach counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more cores.
The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a little sharper screen than LG X Mach, because although it has a little lower pixel amount in each screen inch, and they both have an equal 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, the Galaxy Note 5 also counts with a little larger screen. The Galaxy Note 5 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy Note 5 also has a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The LG X Mach has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note 5 and LG X Mach both have incredibly similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.