Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-21 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than LG X Mach, getting an 86.2 score against 73.5. The Galaxy Note10 Lite construction is way heavier but a little thinner than LG X Mach. Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit superior CPU than LG X Mach, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and also faster).
The LG X Mach has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels number in each display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than LG X Mach, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Note10 Lite captures a lot better videos and photos than LG X Mach, although it has a back camera with less mega pixels resolution and a lower video definition. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a very superior battery duration than LG X Mach, because it has a 50 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.