Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is a lot better than LG X Mach, having a score of 89.7 against 73.5. The Galaxy S10 Lite design is just a bit thinner but heavier than LG X Mach. The Galaxy S10 Lite has a little better hardware performance than LG X Mach, because it has 5 GB more RAM and more CPU cores. LG X Mach features a brighter display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a way bigger storage for applications and games than LG X Mach, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a much longer battery life than LG X Mach, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a very superior camera than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution back camera and higher video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.