Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a lot better than LG X Mach's overall score of 73.5. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a notably heavier device than LG X Mach, but both of them are equally thin. The LG X Mach has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a little lower 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixels density.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a quite better hardware performance than LG X Mach, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG X Mach, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much better photos and videos than LG X Mach, because it has a much higher video quality and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much longer battery duration than LG X Mach, because it has a 67% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.