Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| -- | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is much better than LG X Mach's 73.5 score. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a notably heavier phone than the LG X Mach, but both of them are 0.35inches thick. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit better processing power than LG X Mach, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little more vivid screen than LG X Mach, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen, much more brightness and a bit higher 1440 x 3088px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures greater videos and photos than LG X Mach, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
LG X Mach counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior battery performance than LG X Mach, because it has a 67% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.