Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 5.33 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 is better than LG X Mach, with a global score of 82.6 against 73.5. Samsung Galaxy S25 is a extremely lighter and much thinner cellphone than the LG X Mach. Galaxy S25 features a bit more vivid display than LG X Mach, because although it has a bit lower display density and a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with much more screen brightness and a little bigger screen.
LG X Mach counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG X Mach features a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy S25, although it has lesser RAM and 2 less cpu cores.
The Galaxy S25 features better battery life than LG X Mach, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots way better videos and photos than LG X Mach, because it has a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a way higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.