Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is a bit better than the LG X Mach, with a 79.5 score against 73.5. The Samsung Galaxy S7 construction is somewhat thinner but just a little heavier than LG X Mach. Samsung Galaxy S7 has just a little better performance than LG X Mach, because although it has lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy S7 has a bit more vivid screen than LG X Mach, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, the Galaxy S7 also counts with a little higher pixels density and a really brighter screen. LG X Mach has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S7, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal memory, the LG X Mach also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a battery performance that is very similar to LG X Mach's battery performance. Samsung Galaxy S7 shoots better pictures and videos than LG X Mach, although it has a lesser mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a worse (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.