| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 534 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than the LG X Mach, getting an 80.1 score against 73.5. Even being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy XCover FieldPro's construction is much heavier and incredibly thicker than the LG X Mach. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more powerful processor than LG X Mach, because it has a higher number of cores and 1 GB more RAM memory.
LG X Mach counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, the LG X Mach also counts with a little bigger screen. The LG X Mach features a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior battery performance than LG X Mach, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The LG X Mach counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a lot better (4K) video definition and a camera with a higher 12.3 MP resolution.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.