Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 534 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than the LG X Mach, getting an 80.1 score against 73.5. Even being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy XCover FieldPro's construction is much heavier and incredibly thicker than the LG X Mach. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more powerful processor than LG X Mach, because it has a higher number of cores and 1 GB more RAM memory.
LG X Mach counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, the LG X Mach also counts with a little bigger screen. The LG X Mach features a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior battery performance than LG X Mach, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The LG X Mach counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a lot better (4K) video definition and a camera with a higher 12.3 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.