Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is much better than the LG X Mach's 73.5 global score. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's body is thicker and noticeably heavier than the LG X Mach. LG X Mach has a sharper screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
LG X Mach counts with a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy XCover Pro has just a little better hardware performance than LG X Mach, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and faster).
Galaxy XCover Pro has a better camera than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a lot more mega pixels camera in the back. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a superior battery duration than LG X Mach, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.