Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than the LG X Mach, with a 92.3 score against 73.5. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a heavier but somewhat thinner phone than LG X Mach. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a more powerful CPU than LG X Mach, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
LG X Mach counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per display inch. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG X Mach, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much better camera than LG X Mach, although it has a camera in the back with a worse 12 MP resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better battery lifetime than LG X Mach, because it has a 10% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.