Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is much better than LG X Mach's 73.5 overall score. Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a noticeably thinner but a lot heavier phone than the LG X Mach. LG X Mach counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a really smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1440 x 2560px, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit bigger memory for games and applications than LG X Mach, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a quite better hardware performance than LG X Mach, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a lot better camera than LG X Mach, although it has a lower resolution camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 video definition. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a way better battery duration than LG X Mach, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.