Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 8.36 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a lot better than the LG X Mach, getting a 90.6 score against 73.5. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a way thinner but noticeably heavier phone than LG X Mach. The LG X Mach features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little lower 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a higher screen density.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a quite better performance than LG X Mach, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The LG X Mach captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a camera with a higher resolution. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG X Mach, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a really longer battery performance than LG X Mach, because it has a 4400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.